Select Language

English

Down Icon

Select Country

France

Down Icon

Loading

Pesticides Interview : Why Can't We Live Without Them?

The measure structured the sometimes heated debates between MPs. These skirmishes only took place in committee, since at the height of the tensions, the bill's supporters had themselves rejected it at first reading, in order to circumvent a wall of rebellious and environmentalist amendments and force its passage through the joint committee.

The left and the environmentalists will have a hard time preventing the final adoption on Tuesday, barring a turnout mishap. A large part of the government coalition (Renaissance, MoDem, Horizons, LR) and the RN-UDR alliance are expected to support it, according to sources within the groups.

"We are quite satisfied," commented MP Hélène Laporte (RN), asking the government for rapid implementing decrees for farmers.

And while some centrist parliamentarians are expected to vote against or abstain, their groups are expected to rely on gains made in the joint committee over the Senate version to call for a vote in favor. This includes the withdrawal of a controversial measure questioning the independence of the health agency ANSES.

Constitutional remedies provided for

"Poison law" for environmentalists, "obstacle to the agroecological transition" for the socialist Dominique Potier, the text no longer contains either "one-upmanship or renunciation" , believes on the contrary Marc Fesneau, leader of the MoDem deputies.

Also read

Green and socialist MP Marie-Charlotte Garin at the National Assembly, in Paris, on January 29, 2025.

Tribune "The Duplomb law is a license to harm from another era," warns Marie-Charlotte Garin, Green MP for the Rhône and contaminated with PFAS

The bill also includes measures to facilitate water storage for irrigation, in a context of water scarcity linked to climate change. But these measures are heavily criticized on the left, as are those providing for facilitating the expansion or creation of intensive livestock buildings. The Greenpeace association called in a press release to vote against "this text which is toxic for public health and the environment."

Anticipating a potential definitive adoption, rebels, environmentalists and socialists are considering appeals to the Constitutional Council, some believing that the law contravenes the principles of precaution and non-environmental regression.

By The New Obs with AFP

Le Nouvel Observateur

Le Nouvel Observateur

Similar News

All News
Animated ArrowAnimated ArrowAnimated Arrow