Liga MX: The 'Stove' Burns, FIFA Freezes, and the Owners Hide

While fans are getting excited about the Apertura 2025 transfer frenzy, with an avalanche of rumors about signings and departures at clubs like América, Chivas, Cruz Azul, Pumas, and Santos, FIFA, with its cold bureaucracy, gives them a dose of reality. Pumas and Atlas have been "disqualified" from making signings due to "administrative issues" and "outstanding financial obligations." Atlas, in particular, "acknowledged responsibility" for a "delay in submitting the required documentation."

Atlas's excuse of a "documentation delay" is as believable as a politician's promise. This proves that the "leg market" is a farce if clubs can't even comply with basic rules. Liga MX is a circus where clowns can't even buy their own costumes.

The exuberance of "Stove Football" stands in stark contrast to FIFA's sanctions. This reveals that the Liga MX transfer market is, in part, a media fiction that masks underlying financial and administrative problems. The inability of major clubs to register players due to "outstanding obligations" suggests a systemic fragility in the league's financial management, where sustainability is often sacrificed for short-term competitiveness, or simply incompetence.

Transfer bans not only affect clubs' ability to assemble competitive rosters, but can also generate distrust between players and their agents. If a club can't guarantee compliance with basic registration standards, how reliable is it in honoring contracts and salaries? This could discourage talented players from joining certain teams, affecting the overall quality of the league and the perception of its professionalism.

Alejandro Irarragorri, owner of Santos Laguna and Atlas, is not only a soccer magnate, but now also a "fugitive from justice" and has been ordered arrested for "alleged tax evasion." The charge is for 17 million pesos, although there are "two separate investigations underway" totaling $65 million. The Santos Laguna club issued a statement defending "due process and the presumption of innocence," arguing that this is an "administrative and/or interpretive matter" that has been brought before the criminal courts.

While fans worry about signings, the club's boss hides from the authorities. The club's defense, calling it an "administrative and/or interpretive matter," is a gem of corporate cynicism. In other words, stealing from the treasury is merely an "interpretation" of the law.

This shows that Mexican soccer not only has problems on the field, but also in the offices, where corruption seems to be just another sport. It's no wonder no one wants to coach Santos when the owner is on the most wanted list.

The tax evasion charge and Irarragorri's declaration as a "fugitive" are compelling evidence of corruption at the highest levels of club ownership. This isn't just a legal issue for an individual; it's a blow to the credibility and stability of the entire Liga MX. If the owners are involved in criminal activities, how clean are the clubs' operations? This can affect investment, the league's international reputation, and the morale of employees and players.

The club's response of downplaying the accusation as an "administrative matter" is an attempt to normalize illegality. This rhetoric seeks to divert attention from the seriousness of the charges and suggests a culture where financial violations are viewed as mere "interpretative disagreements." This creates a dangerous precedent, where the line between corporate governance and criminal activity blurs, undermining confidence in transparency and fairness within the sport.

The coaching carousel in Liga MX moves faster than a taco al pastor on a Friday night. Gabriel Milito at Chivas, Francisco Rodríguez Vílchez at Santos, Domènec Torrent at Monterrey, Jaime Lozano at Pachuca, Sebastián Abreu at Xolos… the list is endless. It seems Mexican clubs have the patience of a child with a new toy.

Fernando Ortiz, the former Santos coach, "broke his silence" after his departure, suggesting "many things" that he "let slide," and his club fired him after a "dismal" performance.

Coaching instability isn't a coaching problem; it's a symptom of a chronic illness in Liga MX: a lack of long-term vision, excessive pressure, and a "results now" culture that doesn't allow for serious projects. The high turnover of coaches and "controversial" departures like that of Fernando Ortiz reflect a culture of impatience in Liga MX.

Coaches become scapegoats for deeper structural problems, such as financial instability or poor management. This impedes the development of long-term projects and fosters a vicious cycle of hiring and firing, where short-lived success is the only metric.

Constant instability in the dugout affects the identity and sporting development of clubs. Without a consistent vision, it's difficult to implement playing philosophies, develop young talent, or build a solid foundation. This can lead to competitive stagnation and a loss of connection with fans, who see their team change direction every few months, losing coherence and direction.

This table is essential for consolidating the complex interconnections between financial problems, FIFA sanctions, and ownership scandals in Liga MX. It demonstrates that these are not isolated incidents, but rather symptoms of a broader problem affecting the integrity and functioning of the league.

Follow us on our X La Verdad Noticias profile and stay up to date with the most important news of the day.