The Acquittal of Tyre Nichols’ Killers and the Hollow Promise of 2020

Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
Tyre Nichols was murdered.
Not killed. Not lost. Not a life that simply “ended.” He was murdered. He was ripped from the fragile thread of existence by the deliberate choices of men who decided that his life did not matter. His life was stolen, snatched from the world beneath the fists, boots, and batons of men who wore the authority of the state on their chests.
Dragged from his car on a January night in 2023 for alleged reckless driving on a dark Memphis road. Five officers beat Nichols mercilessly, fists crashing into his face, boots smashing his ribs, a baton splitting the air and cracking against his skull. They laughed while he screamed. They mocked him while he begged for his mother. They called him a “bitch”— and worse—while his voice broke, his fear exposed, his dignity stripped, his life withering beneath their hands.
Again, Nichols was accused simply of reckless driving, the kind of claim that should mean a ticket, a court date, an argument over a fine. Not a death sentence. The kind of accusation that, in the eyes of the Constitution, is supposed to be met with a process, a calm exchange, a conversation beneath the protection of rights. A chance to contest, to be heard, to be seen. But for Black Americans, the promise of due process is too often a mirage, a pledge written in ink that fades when touched. In its place is the law of the street. In its place is the verdict of the badge. In its place is violence.
Three of the officers who brutalized Tyre Nichols have been acquitted, found not guilty by a jury drawn not from Memphis, the city where Nichols was beaten to death, but from a different part of Tennessee, insulated from the pain, from the streets still stained with his blood. A jury of Americans that looked at the footage of a man being battered to death and saw an open question. A jury that stared at the blows, the screams, the begging, and chose to believe the uniforms instead of the suffering they witnessed frame by frame. Once again, a jury speaks clearly: The badge is not a symbol of accountability. It is an alibi.
Two of the former officers who brutalized Tyre Nichols still stand to be sentenced federally, a thread of accountability grasped only because the Department of Justice saw in their actions not just a breach of duty but a violation of fundamental rights. But that narrow federal reprieve does not cleanse the stain of the state acquittals. It does not erase the mockery of a system that looks at a man being beaten to death beneath the fists of those who swore to protect and calls it justice.
A federal conviction is not a cure for a system that refuses to see Black suffering as a crime. It is not a victory for truth when a state can look at the blood on its streets and shrug. It is not an answer when the highest charge carries the faint hope of accountability only because another government intervened. It is a bandage on a festering wound. It is a hollow promise whispered over a grave.
State acquittals of police lawlessness are not just a failure. They are a signal. A signal that the machinery of local justice has not only tolerated but embraced its role as the protector of brutality. That the courtrooms meant to deliver justice have become sanctuaries for those who mock it. That the juries meant to be the voice of the community have become the chorus of complicity. Federal charges are, in some ways, an admission that the state cannot be trusted.
And in that void, where state justice has failed, where the community’s voice has been silenced, where the law has turned its back, we are left to ask: What does it mean when the only justice we can hope for must come from a distant, reluctant hand?
And it only gets worse.
Under Donald Trump’s presidency, the lie of progress has become a weapon. Days ago, Trump signed an executive order that not just dismantles federal oversight of the most violent police departments. It consecrates their cruelty. He proudly declared that his administration was “strengthening and unleashing America’s law enforcement” while deriding efforts to “demonize law enforcement and impose legal and political handcuffs.”
His administration endeavors to shred consent decrees, the fragile agreements meant to rein in police brutality, dismissing them as an insult to officers. Federal monitors who once watched the most abusive departments will be swept aside, their management condemned as unnecessary interference. And even more chillingly, the order makes clear that local prosecutors who pursue accountability for police violence will face scrutiny themselves, their actions cast as threats to public order.
The message in this case, like so many others, is clear: There are no rules, only force. There is no accountability, only allegiance. Brutality is not a failure. It is a virtue. The badge is not just a symbol of authority. It is a weapon, a license to dominate. Those who wield it are not only protected—they are applauded. State violence is not merely tolerated—it is endorsed. And this administration has made clear that those who brutalize will be celebrated as patriots.
It’s notable that this acquittal happened in the same month that George Floyd was murdered five years ago. Since the summer of 2020, the nation that painted streets with the words Black Lives Matter has scrubbed them clean. The corporate giants that filled their social media feeds with solidarity have quietly deleted their posts, their promises of change swept away in a return to comfortable silence. Diversity initiatives have been scuttled, the kente cloth draped in the Capitol has been folded and forgotten, its symbolism exposed as empty theater.
The NFL’s end zones no longer shout for justice, having removed what should have been a banal message: “End Racism.” Teams that once locked arms and knelt in a symbolic show of unity have returned to the choreography of indifference. The CEOs who tweeted #BlackLivesMatter now offer platitudes about “unity” without acknowledging the brutal reality of state violence. The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, a promise born in the streets where millions marched and mourned, died quietly in Congress—smothered beneath partisan bickering and legislative cowardice. A reform abandoned, a reckoning that was never real.
For all the names I know—Tyre Nichols, George Floyd, Trayvon Martin, Philando Castile, Breonna Taylor, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, Sandra Bland, Walter Scott, Michael Brown, Alton Sterling, Freddie Gray, Laquan McDonald, Rodney King, Atatiana Jefferson, Botham Jean, Oscar Grant, Stephon Clark, Sonya Massey—there are thousands more. Names that never became hashtags. Lives that ended in back alleys, side streets, police vans, jail cells, and empty fields. Men and women brutalized out of sight, away from cameras, erased without a whisper of outrage.
Tyre Nichols was more than his suffering. He was more than the screams they mocked, more than the body they shattered, more than the blood they left on the pavement.
Tyre Nichols was a son, a father, a man with dreams that stretched beyond the Memphis streets—a lover of sunsets, a young man with a skateboard beneath his feet and a camera in his hands, capturing light and chasing joy. He was not a symbol or a statistic. He was a life interrupted.
Until we confront the truth, that this system is not broken but monstrous, nothing will change.
They told us in 2020 that real change was coming. But the only thing that has changed is the name. And the blood keeps flowing.
Beneath the pain, there is power no one can take from us—the only offering we can make. The power to refuse silence, to name this violence, to tell the truth. To speak the names we know and to honor the countless others we never will.

Slate