Judge Celebrates Charlie Kirk Death: Who Is Hamilton County Judge Ted Berry?

• Judge Ted Berry is a Hamilton County Municipal Court judge embroiled in controversy over inflammatory comments about Charlie Kirk’s death.
• His remarks were widely condemned for being racially charged and politically divisive, prompting calls for his resignation.
• The Joe Burrow Foundation removed Berry from its advisory board to maintain alignment with its core values.

Hamilton County Judge Ted Berry sparked significant controversy after making inflammatory social media comments following the death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk.

Let’s look into who Judge Berry is, the context and fallout of his remarks, and the broader implications for judicial conduct and public trust.

Who Is Hamilton County Judge Ted Berry?

Ted Berry is a long-serving Municipal Court judge in Hamilton County, Ohio, having been elected to the bench in 2005. Known within the Cincinnati area judicial circuit, Berry has been involved in local governance and had advisory roles such as a position on the Joe Burrow Foundation’s advisory board.

His career in public service has spanned nearly two decades, but recent events have thrust him into the national spotlight for reasons far removed from his judicial duties.

Following the tragic shooting death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University, Judge Berry posted highly charged comments on social media. He wrote phrases such as “Rest in Hatred & Division” and questioned, “How’s he feel about gun violence & gun control in Hell, now?”

He further commented on the racial context of the incident, linking it to broader social tensions. These posts were widely criticized as vitriolic and racially charged, prompting condemnation from state officials and the public.

Meet the Dishonorable Ted Berry, one of America’s most vile judges.

This man has no right enforcing the law while making disgusting comments like this. He CANNOT BE TRUSTED.

Make sure to let the courts know what you think of him. pic.twitter.com/LM0XbRNVZ1

— WPL (@WomenPostingLs) September 13, 2025

Political and Social Fallout

State Representative Adam Mathews publicly called for Judge Berry’s resignation, describing the judge’s remarks as a breach of Ohio’s Code of Judicial Conduct. Mathews emphasized that judges must embody impartiality and fairness, qualities Berry’s comments seemingly violated.

The controversy led to calls for disciplinary action, including filing grievances with the Ohio Supreme Court. The outcry underlined concerns about the impact such behavior has on public confidence in the judiciary.

Removal From the Joe Burrow Foundation

In reaction to the backlash, the Joe Burrow Foundation, established by NFL quarterback Joe Burrow to support youth programs, announced the immediate removal of Judge Berry from its advisory board.

The foundation clarified that Berry’s comments were inconsistent with its values of accountability and respect, seeking to distance itself from any association with the remarks. This action demonstrated the broader consequences of public statements made by individuals in positions of authority and trust.

Judge Berry’s Response and Public Perception

Judge Berry later issued a statement claiming that he did not support violence and that causing division was not his intent. He expressed regret for any discord his words might have caused.

Despite this, many remain critical, holding that a judge’s role demands higher standards of conduct, especially in sensitive public matters. This episode highlights the tension between personal expression and judicial decorum in the digital age.

Also Read: Is trans Lance Twiggs The Partner And Roommate Of Tyler Robinson?

Last Updated on September 15, 2025 by 247 News Around The World